A decision support system for demolition safety risk assessment

Demolition can be defined as dismantling, razing, destroying or wrecking of any building or structure or any part thereof. Demolition work involves many of the hazards associated with construction. However, demolition also involves additional hazards due to unknown factors which makes demolition work particularly dangerous. In order to make the demolition project safer, everyone at a demolition site must be fully aware of the hazards they may encounter and the safety precautions that they must take to protect themselves and their employees. Safety risk assessment is a planning tool that can be used to improve safety performance at demolition site. In the absence of a special tool for demolition safety risk assessment, a prototype Decision Support System (DSS) based on failure mode and effect analysis that enables decision makers to systematically and semi-quantitatively identify, analyze and evaluate safety risks factors in demolition project has been developed. The prototype is named Hybrid Demolition Safety Risk Assessor (HDSRA). It has three modules; (i) safety risk identification, (ii) safety risk analysis and (iii) safety risk evaluation. Module one aids the decision makers to identify thirty-seven safety risks that is developed by reviewing safety literatures and forming consensus among Delphi panel of experts. In addition, the module introduces seven immediate causes that trigger occurrence of those thirty-seven safety risks. The second module comprised a hybrid decision making model based on Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) that relatively estimates likelihood of thirty-seven safety risks with respect to seven immediate causes. The third module evaluates and prioritizes the safety risks by using two ranking methods; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). The HDSRA prototype is then developed by integrating module 1, 2 and 3 and evaluated by a group of demolition experts. HDSRA acts as information source that can be used by demolition contractors to identify safety risks in a systematic way. Therefore, possibility of raising error during risk identification process in the implementation of demolition work is reduced. Decision support system that is produced by the HDSRA prototype, proactively proposes action that should be taken by demolition safety experts to control risks at workplace. And finally, HDSRA can be also used as a training tool to raise safety awareness among demolition workers

A hybrid quality function deployment and cybernetic analytic network process model for project manager selection

Identifying appropriate decision criteria and making optimal decisions in a structured way is a complex process. This paper presents an approach for doing this in the form of a hybrid Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Cybernetic Analytic Network Process (CANP) model for project manager selection. This involves the use of QFD to translate the owner's project management expectations into selection criteria and the CANP to weight the expectations and selection criteria. The supermatrix approach then prioritises the candidates with respect to the overall decision-making goal. A case study is used to demonstrate the use of the model in selecting a renovation project manager. This involves the development of 18 selection criteria in response to the owner's three main expectations of time, cost and quality

Occupational Therapy Interventions Effect on Mathematical Problems in Students with Special Learning Disorders

Objectives: Dyscalculia is specific learning disabilities affecting the acquisition of mathematic skills in an otherwise normal child. The aim of this study was investigation of occupational therapy interventions effect on mathematical problems in students with special learning disorders. Methods: 40 students with dyscalculia (2-5 grades) were selected and divided through randomized permuted blocks method into two groups 20 persons as intervention group and the others as the control group. Initially both of groups were administered by the &quot;Iran Key math Test&quot;. Then intervention group received occupational therapy interventions for 20 sessions individually and two groups were administered by the Test again. Data was analyzed by using Paired and Independent t-tests. Results: By the paired sample t-test the mean of total marks of Iran Key math Test demonstrated statistically significant difference in both of groups (P<0.05), but the measure of difference in intervention group was more than control group. The mean of marks of Basic Concepts, Operations and Applications demonstrated statistically significant difference at intervention group. Discussion: Occupational therapy interventions had clinical effect on mathematical problems in students with special learning disorders

Identification and evaluation of risk allocation criteria and barriers: a Malaysian public private partnership project case study

Risk allocation is a key to managing risks associated with the public private partnership projects. Optimal risk allocation between the parties involved, namely public and private, is the essence of successful PPP project implementation. This study intends to identify and prioritize significant risk allocation criteria and barriers preventing the optimal allocation of risk to PPP projects in Malaysia. Due to interaction among criteria and barriers, this research has adopted analytic network process in order to decompose decision model into meaningful network and weight decision elements. Data has been collected through literature review, questionnaire and interview with PPP project experts. This study reveals that "Bear the risk at lowest price”, “Control the chance of risk" and "Risk attitude" are three major optimal risk allocation criteria. “Different sets of information about project risk”, "Lack of efficient risk allocation mechanisms" and “Lack of understanding the benefits of optimal allocation” are of three major optimal risk allocation barriers identified throughout the study. The outcome can be used to improve the implementation of PPP project in Malaysia by more rationally allocating risks between parties involved

Evaluation of the relation between cerebroplacental ratio, umbilical-cerebral ratio, and cerebro-placental-uterine ratio with the occurrence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction

Introduction: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major obstetric complication associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between Doppler parameters, including the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR), and cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR), with adverse perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies complicated by FGR. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective study of 100 women with a singleton pregnancy 28 and 36.8 weeks of gestation was complicated by FGR and mild abnormalities. Feto-maternal Doppler examinations were conducted by the CPR, UCR, and CPUR parameters. Adverse outcomes were defined as Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, preterm birth <37-week, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, fetal distress, and emergency cesarean section.These outcome parameters were checked with the results of the last ultrasound which performed 1-2 weeks before delivery. Results: Mean umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) (1.18±0.31 versus 1.04±0.21, P=0.010) and mean uterine arteries (UtAs)-PI (1.18±0.45 versus 0.96±0.36, P=0.20) were significantly higher in pregnancies that experienced adverse perinatal outcomes than those that did not experience them. Mean CPUR (1.82±1.03 versus 2.25±0.83, P=0.039) was significantly lower in pregnancies that experienced adverse perinatal outcomes versus those that did not. In binary multivariate logistic regression analysis, CPR, UCR, and CPUR parameters were evaluated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Only CPUR had a significant relationship with adverse perinatal outcomes. CPUR had a substantial relationship with Apgar score [removed